<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Academic Academy Awards	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://markstaples.com/2009/09/25/academic-academy-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://markstaples.com/2009/09/25/academic-academy-awards/</link>
	<description>Software, research, and leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: liming		</title>
		<link>https://markstaples.com/2009/09/25/academic-academy-awards/#comment-56</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[liming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markstaples.com/?p=140#comment-56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice ideas...not cheap though. :-)
I probably should have used &quot;fully validated ideas&quot; instead of &quot;validated ideas&quot;. Workshop papers do have some degree of validation. Actually, I wanted to use (relatively) &quot;easily validated ideas&quot; ... you know what I mean..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice ideas&#8230;not cheap though. 🙂<br />
I probably should have used &#8220;fully validated ideas&#8221; instead of &#8220;validated ideas&#8221;. Workshop papers do have some degree of validation. Actually, I wanted to use (relatively) &#8220;easily validated ideas&#8221; &#8230; you know what I mean..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
